![]() Then President Pratibha Patil launched the project in August 2009. Like Line 1, this corridor was also proposed to be constructed on a public private partnership (PPP) model. This was planned to be the second corridor of the Mumbai Metro. In the updated master plan, the proposed Charkop–Bandra–Mankhurd and Charkop–Dahisar lines were merged into a single Dahisar–Bandra–Mankhurd line, which would have been 32 km (20 mi) and had 27 stations. ![]() A 13.37 km (8.31 mi) long Bandra-Kurla–Mankhurd line and a 7.5 km (4.7 mi) line from Charkop to Dahisar were proposed as Line 3 and Line 4, respectively, in the same plan. Planning Public private partnership with RInfra Ī 38.24 km (23.76 mi) long Colaba–Bandra–Charkop line was proposed as Line 2 in the original Mumbai Metro master plan unveiled by the MMRDA in 2004. The new 9.5 km (5.9 mi) section of the yellow line from Dahanukarwadi to DN Nagar was inaugurated on January 19, 2023, by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This section shall be 18.589 km (11.551 mi) long, and comprise 17 of the 39 stations that form part of this route. Road), began in November 2016, and was completed in April 2022. On 19 January 2023, the whole line (2A) from Dahisar East to Andheri West (DN Nagar on Line 1) was operational for the public.Ĭonstruction on the first section of the line, called Metro 2A (between Dahisar and D.N. ![]() Phase One of Line 2A was partially opened on 2 April 2022 from Dahisar East to Dahanukarwadi. The Yellow Line (Line 2) of the Mumbai Metro is the second metro line in the city of Mumbai connecting Dahisar in the northwest with Mandale in Mankhurd via Andheri, BKC and Chembur in the east. Photos 2/2: Affinity Photo, Topaz Labs AI apps, ZPS X.Photos 1/2: Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom.Methodology: temperature and clock speed tests.Both chips are apparently soldered to the processor’s heat spreader, and the material used is apparently indium-based. It also contains an Infinity Fabric memory controller. Next to it is another larger 12 nm cIOD chip with 125 mm². What is common is PCI Express 4.0 bus support and added value in the form of a bundled cooler (the R5 comes with Wraith Stealth).Ĭompared to Ryzen 9, the Ryzen 5 5600X, just like Ryzen 7, has only one 7 nm chiplet (CCD) on the PCB with an area of 80.7 mm². The TDP of both processors is 65 W, although the PL2 (154 W) on the Core i5 is set quite more aggressively than the PPT (88 W) on Ryzen 5. The most attractive comparison will probably be with the Core i5 11400F, which also has 6 cores and no iGPU (although the Ci5-11600K is closer to the R5 5600X in terms of price). In the tests, we will try to find answers to why a significant surcharge for Ryzen 5 5600X can be justified. It is likely true that AMD bets on its Zen 3 architecture for having brought a significant performance improvement over Zen 2, and Rocket Lake is also slower and less efficient, but it is also in another price category, still suitable for low-budget setups. And yet it is still a hexa-core processor with 12 threads. The 5600X is far from being such a cheap processor as the Ryzen 5 3600, which also got a bit more expensive, but the 5600X is still about a hundred euros pricier and the difference in price is even higher compared to the Ci5-11400F. Thus, the price difference corresponds almost to the amount for which the Core i5-10400F is sold. But maybe I’m wrong and in the end, some cheaper derivative will be released, which will approach the price of the Core i5-11400F. The Ryzen 5 5600X is doing too well on the market for AMD to risk anything. And with great sales of the R5 5600X and limited production capacity, it’s hard to expect a cheaper, lower-clocked non-X model, or something like R5 5500. With the Ryzen 5600X, this is a similar situation as with 8-core processors, of which AMD does not offer any cheaper, lower-clock retail variants. This processor is aimed at a slightly different customer and will not be so advantageous in setups with graphics cards.ĪMD is very careful not to compete with its own processors. Although the APU Ryzen 5 5600G (Cezanne) was released recently at a slightly lower price, there may be no question of any alternative. from the current generation of Ryzen 5000 processors without an integrated graphics core. The Ryzen 5 5600X is still the cheapest processor from the Vermeer family, i.e. It’s a bit of an unequal fight, as the AMD piece is significantly more expensive, but maybe in your eyes it will defend its price in tasks where it is clearly better than the Core i5 Rocket Lake. We will gradually add these, but before the R5 3600, do not miss the extensive comparison of R5 5600X to Ci5-11400F. We’ve already discussed the middle class Intel processors (Core i5) in tests, but so far without comparing it to the equivalent Ryzen 5.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |